Almost nobody searches for a practice area. They type the thing that is happening to them, usually late, usually privately, usually once. We build the site that answers in those words, and the enquiry form a worried person will actually use.
Free site review first. If your current site is fine, we will tell you that.
A prospective client rarely shops around the way the marketing books assume. They are stressed, they are often not at a desk, and they frequently make contact with exactly one firm. These are the four things they settle before they do.
They searched "can my landlord evict me without notice", not "landlord and tenant law". A page using their words beats a page listing twelve practice areas in alphabetical order.
Named people with real photographs, qualifications, enrolment or registration details, and a street address. A firm with a stock photo and a generic "our team" page reads as a lead broker, not a practice.
Not a quote. How you charge. Fixed fee, hourly, staged, or a first conversation at no cost. Silence here is read as expensive, and the person moves on without ever contacting you.
They are about to type something they have told almost nobody. If the form does not say who reads it and what happens next, a large share of them close the tab instead.
Every page has one job: take someone from describing their problem to feeling able to pick up the phone.
Pick by how much of the first contact you want handled, not by page count. Prices below are per project, with hosting and domain billed separately at cost.
Already have a site you like? We also do a fixed-price repair instead of a rebuild. Ask about it on the call.
We built a full sample firm site so you can click through the problem pages, the intake flow and the fees section before you talk to anyone. It is a fictional firm, so nothing on it is a real matter, a real person or a real fee.
Legal marketing is regulated, the rules differ by jurisdiction, and they move. India restricts solicitation by advocates and the permitted scope of online listings has been tested in court. The UK requires certain firms to publish price, service and complaints information. US state bars each set their own advertising rules, including when a disclaimer has to appear. We are not lawyers and we do not interpret any of that for you. We build so that your compliance review is short.
Everything regulated sits in one place. Disclaimers, registration details, complaints route and fee language live in a single reviewable block rather than scattered across nine pages.
No outcome claims anywhere. No success rates, no "we win", no implied guarantee. That language is a problem in most jurisdictions and it persuades experienced clients less than plain description does.
Client quotes only where your regulator allows them, only with written consent, and with any required wording attached. If they are not permitted, we build credibility from named people and described work instead.
Your sign-off before launch, in writing. The compliance block goes to whoever carries that responsibility in your firm, and nothing goes live until they have confirmed it.
If your regulator's position changes, the block is one edit rather than a rebuild. That is the reason it is built as a block.
We do not write fake reviews, invented case studies or testimonials in a client's voice. Anything in quotation marks on your site will be a real person who agreed to it.
We do not promise a position in Google. Anyone who does is guessing. We do the work that makes ranking possible and report what actually happens.
We do not lock you in. Domain, hosting and logins are registered to the firm from day one. You can leave on a Friday and be elsewhere by Monday.
We do not recommend a rebuild when a repair will do. If your site is three fixes away from working, we will quote the three fixes.
We do not put an AI chatbot in front of a potential client without saying so, and we do not let one answer a legal question. At most it acknowledges an enquiry and offers times.
No. We draft everything from one conversation and whatever you already have, then you correct it. Most partners spend around two hours on the whole project, nearly all of it on the first call and the final read-through. Anything that touches regulated wording goes to you before it goes anywhere else.
That judgement is yours, and the rules depend on where you practise. What we do is keep everything regulated in one block, avoid outcome claims entirely, and hand the whole thing to your compliance person before launch. We have built sites for firms under restrictive regimes and under permissive ones, and the structure is the same either way.
Depends on your regulator, and on the matter. Where it is permitted, we describe work without identifying anyone, in the form your rules allow, and with your sign-off on each one. Where it is not, named people with real credentials and clearly written service pages do the same job. Neither version invents a result.
It goes to the inbox you choose, with the information you need to run a conflict check. The form says plainly who reads it, that it is not legal advice, and that sending it does not create a retainer. On the Firm package an after-hours acknowledgement goes out automatically. It gives no advice, quotes no fee, says clearly that it is automated, and a person reads every overnight enquiry the next morning.
Yes, and this is the part firms regret skipping. New joiners, opening hours, a notice about a closure and fee page changes are all editable without a developer. We show your team how in one session and leave a one-page guide. The compliance block is locked unless you ask for it not to be.
Often not. A rebuild throws away rankings and links you have already earned. We look at what you have first and tell you whether three or four fixes would get most of the benefit for a fraction of the cost. We publish that advice on our blog too, including the cases where a rebuild genuinely is the right call.
You do. The domain is registered to the firm with your email as the admin contact, the hosting account is in your name, you are the owner on Analytics and Search Console, and the site admin account is yours. We are happy to manage all of it. Managing it and owning it are different things.
Tell us what your firm does, what work you want more of, and what your current site is doing badly. We will tell you whether we can help and roughly what it would cost. If the answer is that you do not need us, that is a short and useful call.